Yesterday I was at Nordic Founder’s Pitch or Die Trying event at Epicenter in Stockholm.
The highlight was a fireside chat with Charles Maddock, founder of Strawberry, focused on the company’s pre-seed and seed fundraising.
Following Charles was a panel of investors who, among other things, were asked about red flags that would disqualify a company from an investment.
That is a question I find interesting.
I don’t think startup investing is so easy, or companies and founding stories so perfect, that absolute red flags should be used very often or broadly.
The startup investor job is to try and understand each startup and its unique opportunity to become an important, large company.
With the exception of fraud or dishonesty, pretty much all red flag situations (like ownership by founders at Series A, team’s technical or business ability, and previous proof points of founder being great) can be dealt with. The question is if there are signs of exceptional strength in at least one area that make it worthwhile spending the time on it.
By the way, having as a red flag that the founders are married has a pretty poor track record as there are a bunch of outlier outcomes where founders were/are married.